AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lufkin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hanafee, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lufkin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hanafee, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 6, 1283-1287
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Boundary artifact due to truncation errors in MR imaging

RB Lufkin, E Pusey, DD Stark, R Brown, B Leikind, and WN Hanafee

A boundary artifact in MR images due to truncation of the infinite Fourier series necessary to encode tissue discontinuities was investigated by using doped water phantoms and normal volunteers. All images were obtained on 0.3-T permanent and 0.6-T superconducting MR imagers with varying phase and frequency sampling rates. The artifact appeared in both the phase and frequency encoding direction as parallel lines or ringing adjacent to borders or tissue discontinuities. This was unlike motion artifacts, which occur predominantly in the phase direction, and chemical shift misregistration errors, which are most pronounced in the frequency direction. Increasing the sampling frequency from 128 to 512 resulted in higher frequency ringing and more rapid drop-off in amplitude. Low-pass digital filtering also decreased the ringing at the expense of fine detail. The truncation of the infinite Fourier series necessary to encode edges to the 128-512 terms used for most MR imaging produces the artifact. It is important to recognize this common artifact and not mistake it for patient motion or disease.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.