AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 6, 1291-1298
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective

L Berlin

All medical malpractice lawsuits filed in Cook County, IL, from January 1, 1980, through June 30, 1986, were reviewed and compared with similar data for the period of January 1, 1975, through December 30, 1979. A total of 11,203 suits were filed during the 11.5-year period; of these, 1391 (12%) were radiology related. The latter were categorized into six groups. The largest was missed radiologic diagnoses, which accounted for 40% of the total. The remaining groups included complications, 19%; failure to order, 17%; radiation therapy, 11%; slip and fall, 5%; and miscellaneous, 8%. Over the 1975-1986 period, the rise in the number of suits alleging radiologic misses outpaced all other groups. Although the most common type of miss continues to involve fractures, the frequency of missed carcinomas has grown at a disproportionately faster rate. Misses specifically involving CT, nuclear medicine, and sonography also are becoming more prevalent. Radiographic misses continue to occur at an average rate of 30%, with little hope of improvement. Methods to combat the rising number of malpractice suits are discussed. It is concluded that although programs to educate radiologists on risk management should continue, the ultimate solution may be a more enlightened public attitude as to what actually constitutes malpractice, and institution of tort reform measures by federal and state legislatures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Communicating Results of All Radiologic Examinations Directly to Patients: Has the Time Come?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1275 - 1282.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Errors of Omission
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1416 - 1421.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Kakeda, K. Nakamura, K. Kamada, H. Watanabe, H. Nakata, S. Katsuragawa, and K. Doi
Improved Detection of Lung Nodules by Using a Temporal Subtraction Technique
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Communicating Findings of Radiologic Examinations: Whither Goest the Radiologist's Duty?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 809 - 815.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.