AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, T
Right arrow Articles by Vucich, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, T
Right arrow Articles by Vucich, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 1, 171-174
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations

T Fearon and J Vucich

Absorbed doses to the bone marrow, gonads, thyroid, eyes, breast, and skin from CT examinations of the head, chest, abdomen, and torso were measured in a phantom mimicking an average 6-year-old child. The doses were normalized to the CT dose index measured at the central position of a standardized cylindrical phantom, to allow approximation of organ-absorbed doses for similar scanners for which the CT dose index has been measured. Estimating organ-absorbed doses associated with CT examinations of children is necessary to evaluate the relative risks of carcinogenesis associated with radiation exposure of a particular organ. The risks from a particular CT examination depends on the patient's age because the geometric configuration of the organs (e.g., marrow distribution) changes over time and will, therefore, affect the scatter dose to the organs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. L. Nickoloff and P. O. Alderson
Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 285 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. E. Ware, W. Huda, P. J. Mergo, and A. L. Litwiller
Radiation Effective Doses to Patients Undergoing Abdominal CT Examinations
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.