AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kressel, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kressel, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 2, 287-290
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR evaluation of uterine anomalies

MC Mintz, DI Thickman, D Gussman, and HY Kressel

The MR features of uterine anomalies were analyzed in eight women. Scans were done on a 1.5-T magnet with T1-weighted (TR 600 msec, TE 25 msec) and T2-weighted (TR 2000-2500 msec, TE 35-80 msec) spin-echo images obtained in several planes. The anomalies consisted of bicornuate uterus (three cases), septate uterus (one case), bicornuate uterus with septation (two cases), unicornuate uterus (one case), and uterus didelphys with vaginal septum (one case). These diagnoses were confirmed by hysterosalpingography with laparoscopy (five cases), dilation and curettage with laparoscopy (one case), or cesarean section (two cases). In six of the eight cases, MR correctly identified and accurately classified the type of anomaly. In the other two cases, the MR diagnosis was a bicornuate uterus with septation. One case proved to be a uterus didelphys with vaginal septum, and the other a bicornuate uterus without septation. The study shows that MR is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of uterine anomalies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. B. Johnston-MacAnanny, A. S. Lev-Toaff, and F. Batzer
Diagnosis and Treatment of a Communicating Uterus Didelphys With an Atretic Hemivagina: Utility of 3-Dimensional and Intraoperative Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 975 - 978.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Troiano and S. M. McCarthy
Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Imaging and Clinical Issues
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 19 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Haddad, E. Barranger, and B.J. Paniel
Blind hemivagina: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance in 42 cases
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 1962 - 1964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.