AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linkowski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vincenti, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linkowski, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vincenti, F
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 2, 291-295
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonography in the diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

GD Linkowski, V Warvariv, RA Filly, and F Vincenti

High-resolution real-time sonography was used at the time an allograft biopsy was performed on 58 renal transplant recipients to elucidate the cause of posttransplantation decline in renal function. These procedures were performed within 3 months of transplantation. Fifty-four out of 58 patients were on a cyclosporine-steroid regimen. Acute rejection was diagnosed if one or more of the following findings was present on sonogram: transplant swelling, increased conspicuity of the medullary pyramids, medullary pyramid enlargement, decreased renal-sinus fat, and pelvi-infundibular thickening. Correlation of sonography and histopathologic findings showed that sonography cannot be used independently to diagnose rejection or to distinguish between cyclosporine nephrotoxicity and rejection. A creatinine level of 2.5 mg/dl was then randomly selected as a threshold level to possibly improve the sonographic results, anticipating that above this threshold an abnormal sonogram would invariably be recorded in the presence of rejection. This threshold was not found to be discriminatory. Only at a higher threshold level of creatinine (6.9 mg/dl or more) was there 100% correlation between acute rejection and the presence of abnormal sonographic findings. Furthermore, whereas most patients with four or five abnormal sonographic criteria tended to have acute rejection, this group of patients constituted a minority and, even within this group, sonography was not entirely reliable in detecting transplant rejection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.