AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lande, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lande, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 4, 723-726
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The mistaken or indeterminate CT diagnosis of hepatic metastases: the value of sonography

SH Brick, MC Hill, and IM Lande

Small liver cysts may be mistakenly diagnosed as metastatic disease on screening CT of the abdomen in patients with known carcinoma. These cysts can appear solid as a result of volume averaging. On retrospective review of 122 patients with known extrahepatic malignancies and liver lesions on CT, 77 had metastases, three had large cysts, and two had cavernous hemangiomas. The other 40 were found to have single or multiple, small (less than 2-cm), low-density lesions. In 33 patients these were proven to be benign hepatic cysts by sonography, follow-up CT, or clinical course. The initial CT interpretations in these patients had been metastatic disease in seven (21%), benign cysts in five (15%), and indeterminate in 21 (64%). Since the distinction between cysts and metastases has important clinical implications, sonography should be used whenever the true nature of these lesions cannot be determined by CT.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. C. Eberhardt, P. H. Choi, A. M. Bach, S. A. Funt, H. E. Felderman, and L. E. Hann
Utility of Sonography for Small Hepatic Lesions Found on Computed Tomography in Patients With Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.