AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rifkin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rifkin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 4, 759-762
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index

MD Rifkin, L Needleman, ME Pasto, AB Kurtz, PM Foy, E McGlynn, C Canino, OH Baltarowich, RG Pennell, and BB Goldberg

The increasing use and availability of renal transplantation has resulted in a demand for noninvasive methods to study possible complications. One of the most serious adverse reactions is acute rejection, a possibly reversible cause of transplant failure if treated promptly. Differentiation from other causes of acute renal failure frequently is difficult, and the lack of specificity in many imaging studies has been troublesome. Eighty-one patients with renal transplants, including 41 with acute rejection, were examined. Duplex Doppler examination of the intrarenal arteries and a simplified formula, the resistive index ([peak systolic frequency shift--lowest diastolic frequency shift]/[peak systolic frequency shift]), were used to diagnose rejection. With a resistive index greater than 0.90, a 100% positive predictive value was obtained for the diagnosis of acute rejection. A value less than 0.70 was unlikely to be rejection (negative predictive value, 94%). This approach uses a simple analysis of the waveform. Use of a duplex Doppler examination and the formula described here appears to be an accurate method for the detection of acute rejection and for the differentiation of acute rejection from the various other causes of acute renal failure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Lockhart, C. G. Wells, D. E. Morgan, N. S. Fineberg, and M. L. Robbin
Reversed Diastolic Flow in the Renal Transplant: Perioperative Implications Versus Transplants Older Than 1 Month
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 650 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, H. Ozdemir, and D. Karaosmanoglu
Doppler Sonography of Renal Obstruction: Value of Venous Impedance Index Measurements
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Garcia-Criado, R. Gilabert, J. M. Salmeron, C. Nicolau, R. Vilana, L. Bianchi, L. Bunesch, J. C. Garcia-Valdecasas, A. Rimola, and C. Bru
Significance of and Contributing Factors for a High Resistive Index on Doppler Sonography of the Hepatic Artery Immediately After Surgery: Prognostic Implications for Liver Transplant Recipients
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 831 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
G M Baxter
Imaging and renal transplantation
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 285 - 298.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. Polska, K. Kircher, P. Ehrlich, P. V. Vecsei, and L. Schmetterer
RI in central retinal artery as assessed by CDI does not correspond to retinal vascular resistance
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1442 - H1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, and M. E. Murphy
Correlation between Renal Vascular Resistance, Pulse Pressure, and the Resistive Index in Isolated Perfused Rabbit Kidneys
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. N. Josiah JR, G. A. Rouse, and D. M. Williams
A Reevaluation of the Use of Sonography in the Renal Transplant
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1991; 7(6): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
L. B. Newberry and R. C. Nelson
Duplex Sonography in the Evaluation of Pancreas Transplants
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 74 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
G. A.W. Gooding
Color-Flow Doppler Imaging
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1991; 4(1): 138 - 148.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
G. L. Moneta, D. C. Taylor, R. A. Yeager, and J. M. Porter
Duplex Ultrasound: Applications to Intra-abdominal Vessels
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(2): 133 - 148.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.