|
|
||||||||
Articles |
The increasing use and availability of renal transplantation has resulted in a demand for noninvasive methods to study possible complications. One of the most serious adverse reactions is acute rejection, a possibly reversible cause of transplant failure if treated promptly. Differentiation from other causes of acute renal failure frequently is difficult, and the lack of specificity in many imaging studies has been troublesome. Eighty-one patients with renal transplants, including 41 with acute rejection, were examined. Duplex Doppler examination of the intrarenal arteries and a simplified formula, the resistive index ([peak systolic frequency shift--lowest diastolic frequency shift]/[peak systolic frequency shift]), were used to diagnose rejection. With a resistive index greater than 0.90, a 100% positive predictive value was obtained for the diagnosis of acute rejection. A value less than 0.70 was unlikely to be rejection (negative predictive value, 94%). This approach uses a simple analysis of the waveform. Use of a duplex Doppler examination and the formula described here appears to be an accurate method for the detection of acute rejection and for the differentiation of acute rejection from the various other causes of acute renal failure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Lockhart, C. G. Wells, D. E. Morgan, N. S. Fineberg, and M. L. Robbin Reversed Diastolic Flow in the Renal Transplant: Perioperative Implications Versus Transplants Older Than 1 Month Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 650 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, H. Ozdemir, and D. Karaosmanoglu Doppler Sonography of Renal Obstruction: Value of Venous Impedance Index Measurements J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 929 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Garcia-Criado, R. Gilabert, J. M. Salmeron, C. Nicolau, R. Vilana, L. Bianchi, L. Bunesch, J. C. Garcia-Valdecasas, A. Rimola, and C. Bru Significance of and Contributing Factors for a High Resistive Index on Doppler Sonography of the Hepatic Artery Immediately After Surgery: Prognostic Implications for Liver Transplant Recipients Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 831 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand? Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G M Baxter Imaging and renal transplantation Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 285 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Polska, K. Kircher, P. Ehrlich, P. V. Vecsei, and L. Schmetterer RI in central retinal artery as assessed by CDI does not correspond to retinal vascular resistance Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1442 - H1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, and M. E. Murphy Correlation between Renal Vascular Resistance, Pulse Pressure, and the Resistive Index in Isolated Perfused Rabbit Kidneys Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 258 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Josiah JR, G. A. Rouse, and D. M. Williams A Reevaluation of the Use of Sonography in the Renal Transplant Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1991; 7(6): 339 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Newberry and R. C. Nelson Duplex Sonography in the Evaluation of Pancreas Transplants Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 74 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A.W. Gooding Color-Flow Doppler Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1991; 4(1): 138 - 148. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Moneta, D. C. Taylor, R. A. Yeager, and J. M. Porter Duplex Ultrasound: Applications to Intra-abdominal Vessels Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(2): 133 - 148. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |