AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bookstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bookstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 5, 883-888
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Penile magnification pharmacoarteriography: details of intrapenile arterial anatomy

JJ Bookstein and EV Lang

To establish a base of normality against which state-of-the-art penile arteriograms can be assessed, we analyzed selective magnification penile pharmacoarteriograms from 23 men who were not believed to have arteriogenic impotence. The penile arteries showed no evidence of acquired obstructive disease, and all individuals had had normal sexual function in the recent past. The vascular patterns were highly variable and frequently differed from classic descriptions found in textbooks of anatomy. Normal variations that could be easily confused with arterial obstruction were unilateral origin of all cavernosal branches, unilateral hypoplasia of a dorsal penile artery, and aberrant origin of bulbar or cavernosal arteries. Multiple potential collateral routes were shown, including transverse collaterals at the root of the penis and communications between cavernosal and dorsal penile arteries. Appreciation of the type and frequency of anatomic variants and potential collateral routes is important in correctly interpreting penile angiograms and in evaluating the hemodynamic significance of suspected stenoses.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. P. S. Kirkham, R. O. Illing, S. Minhas, S. Minhas, and C. Allen
MR Imaging of Nonmalignant Penile Lesions
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 837 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
T. G. Vrachliotis, M. P. Rosen, A. Morgentaler, and D. Kim
Aberrant Supply of the Common Penile Artery from an Inferior Epigastric/External Pudendal Artery Trunk: Radiological and Urological Implications: A Case Report
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 1997; 31(4): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. B. Khoury and F. M. Contractor
Impotence Caused by Traumatic Pelvic Arteriovenous Communication A Case Report
Angiology, January 1, 1988; 39(9): 849 - 851.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.