AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorenson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorenson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 2, 275-281
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs

JA Sorenson and CR Mitchell

Conventional chest radiography poses a challenging technical problem because of its requirement for simultaneous high-contrast display and wide-latitude recording across the entire image. We developed and evaluated a method of producing chest radiographs by using a tantalum air-interspace grid for highly efficient scatter rejection, wide-latitude X-ray film for recording the low-scatter image, and a LogEtronics printer for optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of the recorded image (TWL technique). TWL images can be readily obtained and have excellent contrast and detail across the entire image. In comparison with a conventional technique, the TWL technique provides about a 15% improvement in image contrast in well-penetrated areas and a threefold to tenfold improvement in poorly penetrated areas. A detection study using simulated lung nodules and a chest phantom showed about 10% overall improvement in nodule detection with the TWL technique (51% vs 42%), most of which was due to improvement in detection rates in poorly penetrated areas of the chest (62% vs 26%). In well-penetrated areas, there was a decrease in detection rates (52% vs 44%) using TWL images despite measured improvements in image contrast in these areas. Possibly this was due to the observers' unfamiliarity with the reversed-contrast TWL images. Our results show the TWL technique to be valuable for improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy in chest radiography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.