AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traughber, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traughber, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 3, 453-456
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Intraarterial fibrinolytic therapy for popliteal and tibial artery obstruction: comparison of streptokinase and urokinase

PD Traughber, PS Cook, TJ Micklos, and FJ Miller

Experience with using intraarterial fibrinolysis in the treatment of occlusive disease of the popliteal artery and runoff vessels is limited. We describe the techniques and results in 25 patients with 30 fibrinolytic infusions of the popliteal and tibial arteries and compare them with the initial and long-term results of treatment using streptokinase and urokinase. The roles of catheter delivery systems and systemic heparin in the prevention of pericatheter thrombus were also studied. Urokinase was initially successful in 18 (90%) of 20 intraarterial infusions, whereas streptokinase was effective in 8 (80%) of 10 intraarterial infusions. Urokinase had the advantages of a shorter effective infusion time and fewer complications. Long-term follow-up was available in 20 of the successfully treated patients. Sixteen of these patients were doing well with an average follow-up of 27 months. The duration of the initial occlusion may be useful in identifying patients at risk for early reocclusion. No limbs were lost because of complications of therapy. The coaxial catheter system with a divided fibrinolytic dose provided protection against pericatheter thrombus, while systemic heparin was ineffective. Our results suggest that urokinase is more effective than streptokinase for intraarterial infusion in the treatment of occlusion of the popliteal and tibial arteries; this procedure is an important alternative to surgery or an adjuvant to surgery in selected patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
Y. Ikeda, H. Wada, M. C. Rummel, C. K. Field, P. K. Bhatnagar, P. A. Khoury, A. R. Wilson, M. D. Kerstein, and T. Matsumoto
Effect on Thrombolysis and its Complication of Graft Occlusion and Specific Risk Factors
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 1995; 29(6): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Anker, I. J. Schneider, A. Melman, T. Palatt, H. Wexler, and B. Cohen
Regional Thrombolysis for Peripheral Arterial Occlusions: Initial Procedure of Choice?: Case Reports
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 1993; 27(9): 701 - 708.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.