AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Magil, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Magil, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 3, 521-525
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The distinction between acute renal transplant rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity: value of duplex sonography

AR Buckley, PL Cooperberg, CE Reeve, and AB Magil

Although sonography is useful in the evaluation of renal transplants, there are no objective sonographic findings for reliably differentiating acute rejection from cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. This study was undertaken to determine the role of pulsed Doppler flow analysis (duplex sonography) in making this distinction. Duplex Doppler sonography was performed in 106 patients with normally functioning transplanted kidneys and in 34 patients with renal transplant dysfunction who underwent percutaneous biopsy. Renal vascular impedance was estimated in the segmental, interlobar, and arcuate arteries by calculating the ratio of end-diastolic minimum velocity to systolic peak velocity (diastolic/systolic ratio). In the healthy control subject, the diastolic/systolic velocity ratios varied in the different arterial segments, ranging from a mean of 0.23 in the segmental arteries to a mean of 0.32 in the arcuate arteries. Seventeen patients experienced acute rejection: eight of the nine with acute vascular rejection had abnormal Doppler ratios; eight patients with acute cellular rejection had normal ratios. Nine patients with cyclosporine nephrotoxicity all had normal duplex scans. Seven patients with chronic rejection had normal ratios. One patient with hemolytic-uremic syndrome had an abnormal flow pattern. These findings indicate that duplex sonography may be useful in differentiating acute vascular rejection from cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in the transplanted kidney.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.