AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 5, 1025-1032
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of lumbar arachnoiditis

JS Ross, TJ Masaryk, MT Modic, R Delamater, H Bohlman, G Wilbur, and B Kaufman

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106.

To assess the usefulness of MR in defining the changes of lumbar arachnoiditis, we reviewed retrospectively the MR, plain-film myelographic, and CT myelographic findings in 100 patients referred for evaluation of failed-back-surgery syndrome. In 11 of 12 cases of arachnoiditis demonstrated by plain-film and CT myelography, an abnormal configuration of nerve roots was seen by MR. The correlated MR and CT and plain-film myelographic changes were divided into three anatomic groups: group 1 showed conglomerations of adherent roots residing centrally within the thecal sac, group 2 demonstrated roots adherent peripherally to the meninges giving rise to an "empty-sac" appearance, and group 3 demonstrated a soft-tissue mass replacing the subarachnoid space. There was one false-negative MR study. For the diagnosis of moderate to severe arachnoiditis, we found MR to correlate excellently with CT myelographic and plain-film myelographic findings.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
L. Talbot, C. Lewis, C. D. D. Hutter, I. Rice, and M. Y. K. Wee
Obstetric epidurals and chronic adhesive arachnoiditis
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 902 - 903.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Rice, M. Y. K. Wee, and K. Thomson
Obstetric epidurals and chronic adhesive arachnoiditis
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 109 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Nagayama, Y. Watanabe, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, S. Nakashita, and Y. Dodo
High-Resolution Single-Slice MR Myelography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 515 - 521.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.