AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimme-Smith, C
Right arrow Articles by Gold, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimme-Smith, C
Right arrow Articles by Gold, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 5, 913-917
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluation of radiation dose, focal spot, and automatic exposure of newer film-screen mammography units

C Kimme-Smith, LW Bassett, and RH Gold

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine 90024.

Fifteen recently introduced mammographic units representing eight different models and manufacturers were evaluated to see whether the equipment performance equaled claims made by the manufacturers. Focal-spot size was measured by pinhole and slit methods. Eight automatic exposure control systems on five models were tested by measuring the optical density produced by imaging at 28 and 30 kVp, with and without a grid and with test objects of varying thicknesses of BR12 epoxy material. Comparable mean glandular dose for a 4-cm-thick BR12 test object was measured for 13 of the units under manual or automatic exposures. Nominal focal-spot size was larger than stated for six of the 15 large focal spots and for seven of the 12 microfocal spots. Comparable doses under automatic exposure control varied more than 100% between units from different manufacturers, while the doses of units from the same manufacturer varied less than 20%. Automatic exposure control systems were operational in eight of the 15 units, but four of these eight were found to be out of calibration. There are considerable performance variations that need to be evaluated before acceptance and use of new mammographic equipment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.