AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrick, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrick, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 6, 1155-1160
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Contrast optimization for the detection of focal hepatic lesions by MR imaging at 1.5 T

WD Foley, JB Kneeland, JD Cates, GM Kellman, TL Lawson, WD Middleton, and RE Hendrick

Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 53226.

The relative efficacies of different spin-echo pulse sequences at 1.5 T were evaluated in the detection of focal hepatic disease. Pulse sequences compared were spin-echo with a repetition time (TR) of 200 msec and echo time (TE) of 20 msec, with six excitations; TR = 300 msec, TE = 20 msec, with 16 excitations (T1-weighted sequences); and a double spin-echo with TR = 2500 and TE = 25 and 70, with two excitations (proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted pulse sequences, respectively). Respiratory-motion compensation, which involved a recording of the phase-encoding gradients (Exorcist), was used for the last two sequences. Spin-echo with TR = 2500 msec and TE = 70 msec was superior in lesion detection and contrast-to-noise ratio. The proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted sequences with respiratory compensation produced better artifact suppression than did the short TR, short TE T1-weighted sequence with temporal averaging. In contradistinction to prior results at 0.6 T, T2-weighted pulse sequences appear superior to T1-weighted pulse sequences with multiple excitations for both lesion detection and artifact suppression at 1.5 T.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, S. B. Jeon, and J. M. Lee
Feasibility of Application of Sensitivity Encoding to the Breath-Hold T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence for Evaluation of Focal Hepatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, and H. Nakamura
Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of Four Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR Imaging Pulse Sequences
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.