AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 6, 1199-1202
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Mineral content of bone: measurement by energy subtraction digital chest radiography

SE Friedman, EV Dubovsky, J Dubovsky, CB Alexander, CA Robinson, EA Sabbagh, GT Barnes, and RG Fraser

Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35233.

Several methods are presently available for measuring the mineral content of bone. Those in widespread use include dual-photon absorptiometry and quantitative CT. The feasibility of using dual-energy digital chest radiography for determination of the mineral content of posterior ribs on digital chest images was studied by using a prototype unit. The results showed a significant difference in the mineral density of the posterior ribs of control subjects and those of patients who had osteoporosis (251.1 +/- 36 mg Ca2+/cm2 of rib vs 158.8 +/- 48 mg Ca2+/cm2, p less than or equal to .01) and a close correlation with values obtained by dual-photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (r = .77). The results suggest that this technique can provide an accurate assessment of the presence or absence of osteoporosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.