AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Im, J.
Right arrow Articles by Niklason, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Im, J.
Right arrow Articles by Niklason, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 1, 61-66
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT densitometry of pulmonary nodules in a frozen human thorax

JG Im, G Gamsu, D Gordon, MG Stein, WR Webb, CE Cann, and LT Niklason

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

The influence of (1) calcium concentration, (2) exposure technique, (3) reconstruction algorithm, (4) nodule size, and (5) nodule location on the CT attenuation values (CT density) of pulmonary nodules was examined in a frozen human thorax. Nodules with calcium concentrations of 0-310 mg/ml and diameters of either 0.95 or 1.59 cm were inserted into a frozen, unembalmed human thorax. The nodules were placed either at the lung apex or 4 cm below the tracheal carina. Each nodule was scanned on a GE CT 9800 scanner; five different exposure techniques were used. The slice thickness was uniformly 1.5 mm. As expected, increasing the kilovoltage caused a significant decrease in CT nodule density in all nodules with calcium concentrations greater than 80 mg/ml. The inverse relationship between kilovoltage and nodule density was exaggerated with increasing calcium concentration. A high-resolution (bone) algorithm gave a significantly higher CT number than did a smoothed (standard) algorithm, regardless of nodule size and location, but this difference could be attributed almost entirely to the edge-enhancement effect of the bone algorithm. The CT density of the larger nodules was significantly higher than that of the smaller nodules at calcium concentrations greater than 65 mg/ml for both standard and bone algorithms. Densities were significantly higher in the mid lung than in the apex with a standard algorithm, but this was not the case with a bone algorithm. The GE CT 9800 scanner had a linear response between CT density and increasing calcium concentration within the confines of a human thorax. A high-resolution (bone) reconstruction algorithm has higher spatial resolution but does show an edge-enhancing effect not found with the smoothed algorithm. Two major variables in CT densitometry for pulmonary nodules are the kilo electron voltage of the X-ray beam and the reconstruction algorithm used; these two parameters should be standardized, with a high kilovoltage and high-resolution algorithm favored on the GE CT 9800 scanner.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Goo, T. Tongdee, R. Tongdee, K. Yeo, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae
Volumetric Measurement of Synthetic Lung Nodules with Multi-Detector Row CT: Effect of Various Image Reconstruction Parameters and Segmentation Thresholds on Measurement Accuracy
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
N. Hollings and P. Shaw
Diagnostic imaging of lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 722 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.