AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, A.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, A.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 1, 97-102
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography

AM Gilchrist, MS Levine, RF Carr, SH Saul, DA Katzka, H Herlinger, and I Laufer

Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5%) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37%) at moderate risk, and 117 (58%) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90%) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16%) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1%) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgment should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine and S. E. Rubesin
Diseases of the Esophagus: Diagnosis with Esophagography
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 414 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Yamamoto, M. S. Levine, D. A. Katzka, E. E. Furth, S. E. Rubesin, and I. Laufer
Short-Segment Barrett's Esophagus: Findings on Double-Contrast Esophagography in 20 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1173 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. M. Plavsic, B. S. Shore, H. B. Rosenthal, and M. M. Payette
Gastrointestinal Case of the Day
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1686 - 1688.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.