AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Naidich, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Naidich, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 2, 301-306
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT

EJ Balthazar, AJ Megibow, D Hulnick, and DP Naidich

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center/Bellevue Hospital, NY 10016.

This report analyzes the detection rate and role of CT in the preoperative evaluation of 90 consecutive, proved cases of colon carcinoma. In this study, the overall detection rate was 84%; however, the rate varied from 68% in unprepared colons to 95% in clean colons that were adequately distended with air. Sensitivity of detection depends mainly on the size of the lesion and the quality of the examination. CT was less sensitive than barium enema in detection, but it had a similar specificity in differentiating neoplastic lesions from inflammatory lesions. On the basis of our criteria of staging, CT evaluation resulted in a sensitivity of 55% for local invasion, 73% for regional nodes, and 79% for liver metastases. Compared with Dukes classification, CT correctly staged 64% of all patients but showed significant variations in staging different groups with lower results in the Dukes A, B, and C patients. CT, however, showed a sensitivity of 81% and a positive predictive value of 100% in detecting Dukes D lesions. In general, although negative CT findings do not help in staging a colonic tumor, positive findings are highly indicative of neoplastic spread. We believe that this feature justifies the use of CT in the preoperative evaluation of colonic tumors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. W. Koo, L. R. Shah-Patel, J. W. Baer, and D. H. Frager
Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Tolerance of Low-Attenuation Oral Contrast Material: Milk Versus VoLumen
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1307 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Burton, G Brown, N Bees, A Norman, O Biedrzycki, A Arnaout, A M Abulafi, and R I Swift
Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Megibow, J. S. Babb, E. M. Hecht, J. J. Cho, C. Houston, M. M. Boruch, and A. B. Williams
Evaluation of Bowel Distention and Bowel Wall Appearance by Using Neutral Oral Contrast Agent for Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 87 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, A. K. Hara, J. A. Leighton, and J. P. Heppell
CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1321 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan and G. L. Beets
Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 335 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Filippone, R. Ambrosini, M. Fuschi, T. Marinelli, D. Genovesi, and L. Bonomo
Preoperative T and N Staging of Colorectal Cancer: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography--Initial Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Kinkel, Y. Lu, M. Both, R. S. Warren, and R. F. Thoeni
Detection of Hepatic Metastases from Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract by Using Noninvasive Imaging Methods (US, CT, MR Imaging, PET): A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 748 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. Gagliardi, S. Bayar, R. Smith, and R. R. Salem
Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging With External Phase-Arrayed Coils
Arch Surg, April 1, 2002; 137(4): 447 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C S Ng, T C Doyle, A K Dixon, R Miller, and M J Arends
Histopathological correlates of abnormal pericolic fat on CT in the assessment of colorectal carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Blakeborough, A. H. Chapman, S. Swift, G. Culpan, D. Wilson, and M. B. Sheridan
Strictures of the Sigmoid Colon: Barium Enema Evaluation
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Horton, R. A. Abrams, and E. K. Fishman
Spiral CT of Colon Cancer: Imaging Features and Role in Management
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 419 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Urban, H. R. Rosen, N. Hölbling, W. Feil, G. Hochwarther, W. Hruby, and R. Schiessel
MR Imaging for the Preoperative Planning of Sphincter-saving Surgery for Tumors of the Lower Third of the Rectum: Use of Intravenous and Endorectal Contrast Materials
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. N. Chintapalli, S. Chopra, A. A. Ghiatas, C. C. Esola, S. F. Fields, and G. D. Dodd III
Diveriticulitis versus Colon Cancer: Differentiation with Helical CT Findings
Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. Guinet, J.-N. Buy, M. A. Ghossain, A. Sezeur, A. Mallet, J.-M. Bigot, D. Vadrot, and J. Ecoiffier
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer
Arch Surg, March 1, 1990; 125(3): 385 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.