AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 4, 823-827
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of focal splenic tumors

PF Hahn, R Weissleder, DD Stark, S Saini, G Elizondo, and JT Ferrucci

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

This study was undertaken to define the MR appearance of splenic tumors in 16 cancer patients with focal splenic lesions; 50 volunteers and liver cancer patients without splenic abnormalities served as controls. In 14 patients with focal splenic lesions, differences between splenic and lesion signal intensities permitted detection of splenic lesions on MR images, either because of cystic or necrotic areas lengthening T2 within the tumor, because of T1 shortening from tumor-associated hemorrhage, or because of T2 shortening of surrounding spleen in two cases of suspected transfusional iron overload. In one spleen, a lesion appeared isointense on both T1- and T2-weighted pulse sequences and was detected only by gross splenic deformity. In one other case, CT defined splenic metastases not visible on MR images. Measurements of signal intensity of normal spleens and tumor are so similar that spin-echo MR imaging can underestimate the size and extent of focal splenic disease or may miss lesions entirely. We conclude that MR imaging is a less sensitive technique for detecting focal lesions of the spleen than for detecting focal hepatic lesions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Elsayes, V. R. Narra, G. Mukundan, J. S. Lewis Jr, C. O. Menias, and J. P. Heiken
MR Imaging of the Spleen: Spectrum of Abnormalities
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 967 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
Y L Wan, Y C Cheung, K W Lui, J H Tseng, and T Y Lee
Ultrasonographic findings and differentiation of benign and malignant focal splenic lesions
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2000; 76(898): 488 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.