AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bundschuh, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bohlman, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bundschuh, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bohlman, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 4, 923-932
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Epidural fibrosis and recurrent disk herniation in the lumbar spine: MR imaging assessment

CV Bundschuh, MT Modic, JS Ross, TJ Masaryk, and H Bohlman

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106.

Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate MR imaging in the differentiation of epidural scar and herniated disk material. Fourteen patients had surgical verification of imaging findings. In 12 (86%) of these patients, the MR interpretations fully agreed with the observations at surgery. Careful integration of the findings on sagittal and axial T1-weighted images with more T2-weighted axial images was important for analysis. Anterior and lateral recess scars were hypo- or isointense on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense on more T2-weighted sequences relative to the "parent" anulus intensity. Free fragments demonstrated a slightly hyperintense signal intensity on T1-weighted images relative to epidural fibrosis but had a similar hyperintense signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Prolapsed or extruded disk fragments were hypo- or isointense relative to the parent anulus on all sequences. Morphology, epidural location, mass effect, and often signal intensity were the important parameters by which scar and herniated disk could be differentiated with MR.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.-S. Hsu, G.-C. Liu, S.-H. Chen, T.-S. Jaw, W.-J. Shen, and C.-Y. Chen
Ionic versus Nonionic Paramagnetic Contrast Media in Differentiating between Postoperative Scar and Recurrent Disk
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. BODEN
Current Concepts Review - The Use of Radiographic Imaging Studies in the Evaluation of Patients Who Have Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 114 - 24.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.