AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madkour, M.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Fayez, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madkour, M.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Fayez, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 5, 1101-1105
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Osteoarticular brucellosis: results of bone scintigraphy in 140 patients

MM Madkour, HS Sharif, MY Abed, and MA Al-Fayez

Department of Internal Medicine, Military Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

One hundred forty patients with proved brucellosis and clinical evidence of bone and joint involvement were evaluated prospectively by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy to assess the frequency of positive findings. To evaluate the radiographic abnormalities associated with positive scintigraphy, all areas of the skeleton that showed abnormal uptake were studied further by plain radiography. High-resolution CT was performed in all patients who had spinal lesions. Ninety-six patients (69%) had abnormal radionuclide uptake in 57 extraspinal and 101 spinal sites. Uptake was increased in 53 joints and three long bones and decreased in one joint. The knee was the most frequently involved site; the second was the sacroiliac joint. Radiographic and high-resolution CT changes were seen in only 12 (21%) of 57 extraspinal sites. In the spine, the abnormal scintigrams showed either focal increased uptake in affected vertebral bodies (detected mostly on the anterior view and seen in 51 lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in 24 patients) or diffuse increased uptake in adjacent vertebrae (detected in anterior and posterior views and seen in 50 different disk levels in 38 patients). Radiographic and high-resolution CT changes were seen at all scintigraphically positive sites. We conclude that bone scintigraphy is a useful method for screening patients with osteoarticular brucellosis. It is more sensitive than radiography in assessing involvement of the extraspinal skeleton and in the spine, it allows accurate localization of affected areas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
L. Baktiroglu, F. Zeyrek, A. Ozturk, P. Yazgan, O. Sirmatel, and E. Isikan
Brucella Osteomyelitis of the Calcaneus
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2005; 95(2): 216 - 217.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.