AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blumhagen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weinberger, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blumhagen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weinberger, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 6, 1367-1370
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonographic diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

JD Blumhagen, L Maclin, D Krauter, DM Rosenbaum, and E Weinberger

Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98105.

In many pediatric centers, sonography has become the primary imaging method for the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, but investigators have disagreed about which dimension of the gastric outlet is most useful and accurate. We analyzed 326 consecutive sonograms in 319 infants who presented with vomiting in order to further evaluate the sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Four observers retrospectively measured three parameters: (1) the thickness of the muscle in the wall of the gastric outlet, (2) the length of that muscle, and (3) the length of the pyloric channel. In the patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, muscle thickness was 4.8 +/- 0.6 mm, muscle length was 2.1 +/- 0.3 cm, and channel length was 1.8 +/- 0.3 cm. In the patients without hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, muscle thickness was 1.8 +/- 0.4 mm, muscle length was 1.3 +/- 0.3 cm, and channel length was 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm. The mean measurement for each parameter was significantly larger in patients who had hypertrophic pyloric stenosis than in those who did not (p less than .01). However, histograms of the three parameters show significant overlap in the measurements of muscle length and channel length between the patients with and those without hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. The thickness of the muscle is the most discriminating and accurate criterion for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
G Papaioannou and K McHugh
Investigation of an abdominal mass in childhood
Imaging, December 1, 2004; 16(2): 114 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. Kovalivker, I. Erez, N. Shneider, E. Glazer, and L. Lazar
The Value of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Congenital Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1993; 32(5): 281 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.