AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quencer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Post, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quencer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Post, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 1, 163-170
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Improved MR imaging of the brain by using compensating gradients to suppress motion-induced artifacts

RM Quencer, RS Hinks, PH Pattany, M Horen, and MJ Post

Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, FL 33101.

Sixty patients were examined with and without extra gradient pulses, which compensate for motion-induced phase errors, in order to determine the effect those gradients had in suppressing the motion artifacts frequently present in the brainstem, temporal lobes, and basal ganglionic regions on routine T2-weighted brain MR imaging. Two comparative studies were performed: (1) in 50 patients the motion-artifact suppression technique (MAST) was compared with a single-echo MR examination, and (2) in 10 patients the MAST technique was compared with the second echo of a symmetric dual-echo sequence. In the first study 39 patients were examined at 1.5 T and 11 patients were examined at 0.5 T with the same pulse sequences. We found that MAST resulted in a significant improvement of image quality in 24 of 39 patients on the high-field-strength system and in two of 11 patients on the mid-field-strength system. In the second study, we found that in four of the 10 patients, MAST resulted in a suppression of artifacts greater than that achieved by even-echo rephasing alone. With MAST, artifacts were eliminated that not only obscured normal structures but that could have left doubt about the presence of a true signal abnormality. There was, however, marked suppression of the CSF flow-void phenomenon and increased signal from flowing blood, particularly in the cortical veins and dural sinuses. Because of this, the use of additional pulse sequences in which these motion-compensating gradients were not used was necessary under certain clinical circumstances. We conclude that, with these motion-compensating gradients, artifacts are reduced or eliminated, and a marked improvement in image quality can be obtained without the need for cardiac gating.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Sparacia, A. Iaia, A. Banco, P. D'Angelo, and R. Lagalla
Transfusional Hemochromatosis: Quantitative Relation of MR Imaging Pituitary Signal Intensity Reduction to Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 818 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.