AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 2, 283-286
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of portal vein thrombosis

HM Levy and JH Newhouse

Department of Radiology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.

MR imaging is emerging as a potential means of detecting portal venous thrombosis (PVT). Therefore, we attempted to establish specific criteria with which to diagnose PVT on conventional spin-echo images. In a retrospective review of 342 consecutive abdominal MR scans performed with a 0.5-T magnet, we identified nine patients with persistent signal in the portal vein and used the findings in these patients to establish criteria with which to diagnose PVT. We subsequently applied these criteria to 109 additional consecutive abdominal MR scans performed with the same magnet. Fifteen cases were found in which all images showed either (1) signal involving the entire width of the portal vein lumen, which approximated (with T1 weighting) and exceeded (with T2 weighting) the intensity of the hepatic parenchyma in images in which the hepatic veins showed a complete flow void or (2) complete nonvisualization of the portal vein and its major branches in images that showed a flow void in portal venous collaterals and hepatic veins. All patients had unequivocal findings of PVT on at least one other imaging study (CT or sonography) or at surgery. Although the sensitivity of these signs could not be calculated, their specificity was 100%. We conclude that in the presence of these signs, the diagnosis of PVT can be made with confidence.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.