High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

Ferromagnetic biomedical implants are considered a contraindication for MR imaging primarily because of the potential hazards associated with their movement or dislodgment. Many metallic biomedical implants are composed of nonferromagnetic materials and do not present a danger to patients during MR imaging. Therefore, to evaluate the ferromagnetic qualities of 36 different metallic biomedical implants (four aneurysm clips, six hemostatic clips, four dental implants, seven prosthetic heart valves, eight orthopedic prostheses, one artificial urinary sphincter, three contraceptive diaphragms, and three cerebral ventricular shunt tube connectors) not previously evaluated with a high-field-strength MR system, we measured deflection forces at the portal of the magnet of a 1.5-T MR system. Fourteen of the 36 metallic biomedical implants were determined to be ferromagnetic as indicated by their deflection in the static magnetic field. However, only the four aneurysm clips (Drake, Mayfield, McFadden, and Sundt-Kees) had sufficient ferromagnetism to warrant exclusion of patients with these implants from imaging with a 1.5-T MR system because of the possibility of movement or displacement. The calculated deflection forces for these aneurysm clips were comparable with previously reported values of certain aneurysm clips that have been designated to present a risk for patients undergoing MR imaging. Patients with 32 of 36 metallic biomedical implants tested can be safely imaged with high-field-strength MR systems.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. G. Shellock, J. A. Tkach, P. M. Ruggieri, T. J. Masaryk, and P. A. Rasmussen Aneurysm Clips: Evaluation of Magnetic Field Interactions and Translational Attraction by Use of "Long-Bore" and "Short-Bore" 3.0-T MR Imaging Systems AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 463 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. G. Shellock and J. V. Crues III MR Safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1349 - 1352. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. Hennemeyer, K. Wicklow, D. A. Feinberg, and C. P. Derdeyn In Vitro Evaluation of Platinum Guglielmi Detachable Coils at 3 T with a Porcine Model: Safety Issues and Artifacts Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hug, E. Nagel, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, H. Oswald, and E. Fleck Coronary Arterial Stents: Safety and Artifacts during MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 781 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Kanal, C. C. Meltzer, P. D. Adelson, and M. P. Scheuer Platinum Subdural Grid: MR Imaging Compatibility Testing Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 886 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Kanal and F. G. Shellock Aneurysm Clips: Effects of Long-term and Multiple Exposures to a 1.5-T MR System Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 563 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text]