CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

Six patients were reviewed who had renal angiomyolipoma (1.2-4.0 cm) in which only minimal amounts of fat were evident on CT. The fat content of the lesion was appreciated because tissue attenuation measurements of small areas of low attenuation within the tumors were performed and because thin-section (5-mm) and nonenhanced CT scans were used. The fat content of the lesions could be identified on 10-mm sections in three cases but only on 5-mm sections in three others. In two cases, fat was seen only on the nonenhanced 5-mm thin sections. Careful sampling of low-density regions within the mass must be performed because a single region of interest over the entire tumor will produce an average attenuation in the soft-tissue range. The use of 5-mm thin sections and thin, nonenhanced CT sections increases spatial and density resolution and decreases susceptibility to partial-volume effects. In a correlative study, no areas of fat were detected in a review of 100 well-circumscribed (4.0 cm or smaller) renal cell carcinomas. Detecting the existence of fat in a renal lesion will establish the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma and is the only radiologic finding that can differentiate it from renal cell carcinoma. Thus, unnecessary surgery will be avoided in these cases.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Pedrosa, M. R. Sun, M. Spencer, E. M. Genega, A. F. Olumi, W. C. Dewolf, and N. M. Rofsky MR Imaging of Renal Masses: Correlation with Findings at Surgery and Pathologic Analysis RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 985 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. Costa, I. Pedrosa, C. McKenzie, S. B. Reeder, and N. M. Rofsky Body MRI Using IDEAL Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1076 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Silverman, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, M. Jinzaki, and E. S. Cibas Hyperattenuating Renal Masses: Etiologies, Pathogenesis, and Imaging Evaluation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1131 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Pereira, C. B. Sirlin, P. S. Pinto, and G. Casola CT and MR Imaging of Extrahepatic Fatty Masses of the Abdomen and Pelvis: Techniques, Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 69 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Frauenfelder, S. Wildermuth, B. Marincek, and T. Boehm Nontraumatic Emergent Abdominal Vascular Conditions: Advantages of Multi-Detector Row CT and Three-Dimensional Imaging RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 481 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Israel, M. A. Bosniak, C. M. Slywotzky, and R. J. Rosen CT Differentiation of Large Exophytic Renal Angiomyolipomas and Perirenal Liposarcomas Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 769 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Fowler and R H Reznek The indeterminate renal mass Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(1): 27 - 43. [Full Text]

				R. J. Zagoria Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Avila, J. A. Kelly, S. C. Chu, A. J. Dwyer, and J. Moss Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Abdominopelvic CT and US Findings Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 147 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. W. Allison, C. A. James, and M. S. Figarola Pediatric Case of the Day RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1388 - 1389. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Chu, K. Horiba, J. Usuki, N. A. Avila, C. C. Chen, W. D. Travis, V. J. Ferrans, and J. Moss Comprehensive Evaluation of 35 Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Chest, April 1, 1999; 115(4): 1041 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]