AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Halverson, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Halverson, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 4, 697-703
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Contribution of SPECT to imaging of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma with 111In-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody

EL Kramer, JJ Sanger, C Walsh, H Kanamuller, MW Unger, and C Halverson

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center/Bellevue Hospital Center, NY 10016.

Fourteen patients with suspected adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract received 1 mg of 111In-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody type ZCE025 combined with 40 mg unlabeled antibody of the same type. Planar and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging studies were performed 3 days after infusion and, when possible, 7 days after infusion. Scan findings were correlated with the findings at surgery when possible. Tumor was detected by day-3 planar imaging in eight of 13 patients in whom tumor was documented histopathologically. Day-3 SPECT allowed demonstration of tumor in 11 of these 13 patients. In another patient whose scan was negative, no residual tumor was found at surgery. SPECT was particularly helpful in identifying small and midline tumors. In two cases, localization on SPECT helped identify the tumor mass on CT. Two primary tumors weighing less than 5 g could not be detected on either planar or SPECT scans. Histologically positive, normal-sized lymph nodes were not seen by planar imaging or SPECT. SPECT increased the detection rate over that achieved with planar imaging, helped to better localize scan abnormalities, and afforded more useful comparison between the monoclonal antibody study and CT.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.