AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fobbe, F
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fobbe, F
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 5, 1031-1034
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Gunther vena caval filter: results of long-term follow-up

F Fobbe, M Dietzel, R Korth, D Felsenberg, S Bender, M Hamed, C Laass, and R Sorensen

Freie Universitat Berlin, Klinikum, Steglitz, W. Germany.

A Gunther vena caval filter was implanted in the inferior vena cava in 59 patients to prevent pulmonary embolism. This newly available device, which can be inserted percutaneously via a 10-French introduction system, has three filtering planes. No complications occurred at the puncture site. Follow-up included clinical examinations (54 patients), plain radiographs (50 patients), and CT scans (41 patients); these examinations were performed up to 21 months after implantation. Caudal migration of the filter occurred in 35 (70%) of the 50 patients who had radiographs, but no cranial or oblique movement occurred. Occlusion of the filter was noted in three (7%) of 41 patients who had CT examinations. Thromboemboli were seen inside the filter in 16 (39%) of the 41 patients who had CT scans. Recurrent pulmonary embolism was not observed after filter implantation. The Gunther vena caval filter seems to be a satisfactory device for preventing pulmonary embolism.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. D. Stein, F. Kayali, and R. E. Olson
Twenty-one-Year Trends in the Use of Inferior Vena Cava Filters
Arch Intern Med, July 26, 2004; 164(14): 1541 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
N. Nakagawa, A. H. Cragg, T. P. Smith, F. Castaneda, S. C. De Jong, and W. H. Barnhart
Experimental Evaluation of a Retrievable Vena Cava Filter
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 1994; 28(1): 7 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Kim, R. R. Edelman, C. J. Margolin, D. H. Porter, C. R. McArdle, B. W. Schlam, L. E. Gianturco, J. B. Siegel, and M. Simon
The Simon Nitinol Filter: Evaluation by MR and Ultrasound
Angiology, July 1, 1992; 43(7): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.