AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fried, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fried, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 5, 923-926
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in the management of bile duct stones

LA Fried, GP LeBrun, RW Norman, DB Fraser, MC Taylor, PD Roy, and JC Marshall

Department of Radiology, Victoria General Hospital Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed in 16 patients with bile duct stones. Dornier HM3 water-bath equipment (Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, GA) was used in all procedures. All patients had either a T-tube or a nasobiliary, cholecystostomy, or transhepatic biliary drainage tube in place at the time of the lithotripsy. In 12 patients, the indication for ESWL was the failure of or anticipated difficulty with basket extraction of the stones, either via a T-tube tract or by means of endoscopic sphincterotomy. In the other four patients, ESWL was performed immediately after retained stones were found on a postoperative cholangiogram, even though no difficulty was anticipated in removing the stones by means of basket extraction. In 15 (94%) of the 16 patients, the stones were successfully fragmented. The fragments passed spontaneously in nine patients but had to be removed by basket in five patients. In one patient, the fragments could not be extracted by basket. The number of ESWL shocks used in a single session ranged from 525 to 3200. Three patients had two ESWL sessions. No significant complications were observed. ESWL is a successful method for the management of patients with bile duct stones when used in conjunction with other nonsurgical techniques. It was also the only treatment required in 56% of our patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.