AJR Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mangano, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mangano, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 5, 947-950
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Golytely-RSS) with a standard preparation for air-contrast barium enema

TL Tomlinson, JA DiPalma, and FA Mangano

Department of Radiology, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-5300.

Golytely is a balanced electrolyte solution for per oral whole-gut lavage. It has been an accepted alternative to standard preparations for barium enema. Golytely-RSS is a new formulation designed to taste better through reduction in sodium and sulfate content. In addition, a slight increase in osmolality is intended to decrease further the net absorption/secretion ratio. One hundred outpatients who were to undergo air-contrast barium enema examinations were randomly assigned one of two colon-cleansing preparations. A standard 1-day diet/cathartic method was compared with Golytely-RSS plus oral bisacodyl. Radiographs were evaluated for the amount of fecal material present and the degree of mucosal coating by two radiologists independently of each other and without knowledge of the preparation used. Good to excellent feces removal was provided by Golytely-RSS in 98% of patients and by the standard method in 95% (p greater than .1, not significant). Mucosal coating also was similar between groups. Unpleasant side effects were reported significantly more often in the lavage group. Unwillingness to use the preparation a second time was reported in 36% of the Golytely-RSS group and in 8% of the standard preparation group (p = .03). Golytely-RSS is an acceptable alternative method to standard colon-cleansing methods for air-contrast barium enema and may be preferable in patients with certain renal or cardiovascular diseases. Side effects may preclude the use of this colon-cleansing regimen routinely.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. E. Rubesin, M. S. Levine, I. Laufer, and H. Herlinger
Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination Technique
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 642 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.