AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yale-Loehr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gearhart, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yale-Loehr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gearhart, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 1, 109-113
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT of severe renal trauma in children: evaluation and course of healing with conservative therapy

AJ Yale-Loehr, SS Kramer, DM Quinlan, ND La France, SE Mitchell, and JP Gearhart

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Over a 2-year period, blunt renal injuries were classified on a four-point scale: grade 1, contusions; grade 2, tears limited to the cortex (renal lacerations); grade 3, tears extending to the collecting system (renal fractures); and grade 4, renal vascular pedicle injuries. We report our findings in nine children with grade 2 and grade 3 blunt renal injuries who were evaluated with CT. One patient had a nephrectomy; the other eight were managed nonsurgically. Six patients had follow-up CT scans 5-19 months later to assess healing. Scars were evident in each case, and the extent of deformity paralleled the magnitude of the initial injury. One patient with a grade 2 injury and two patients with grade 3 injuries healed with small focal scars; three patients with grade 3 injuries healed with large polar scars. In five patients, the CT findings were compared with the findings on 99mTc-DTPA renal imaging. The injured kidneys contributed 30-45% (mean, 38%) of total renal function. In six patients with renal trauma who were treated conservatively, the involved kidneys healed and significant kidney function was preserved, although early surgical intervention might have been beneficial for one of these patients. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate further the effectiveness of this conservative approach.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. L. Dunfee, B. C. Lucey, and J. A. Soto
Development of Renal Scars on CT After Abdominal Trauma: Does Grade of Injury Matter?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1174 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P McAlinden, I Vlahos, M Matson, and O Chan
Imaging of renal trauma
Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(1): 44 - 58.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.