AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, V.
Right arrow Articles by Dreesen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, V.
Right arrow Articles by Dreesen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 1, 131-136
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Dyke award. Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of experimental bacterial meningitis: evaluation and comparison with CT

VP Mathews, MA Kuharik, MK Edwards, PG D'Amour, B Azzarelli, and RG Dreesen

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46223.

Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images of experimental bacterial meningitis were obtained after Staphylococcus aureus was inoculated directly into the cisterna magna of four dogs. Each animal was studied with both unenhanced and enhanced MR and CT with Gd-DTPA and meglumine iothalamate, respectively. The enhancement patterns resulting from these techniques were compared and images were correlated with histopathology. All animals demonstrated abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement on MR with Gd-DTPA, but only one of four dogs exhibited abnormal contrast enhancement on CT. In these animals Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR also identified complications of meningitis, such as ventriculitis and cerebritis, more effectively than CT did. Unenhanced MR was not helpful in identifying meningitis. Histologic evaluation demonstrated that the abnormal areas of contrast enhancement on MR and CT correlated with inflammatory cell infiltration. However, some regions of mild leptomeningitis, ependymitis, and cerebritis identified histologically did not demonstrate abnormal enhancement. Since the animal model used was clinically and pathologically similar to human meningitis, we propose that Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR will subsequently be found more effective than unenhanced MR and IV contrast-enhanced CT for demonstrating meningitis and its complications in humans.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Kamra, R Azad, K N Prasad, S Jha, S Pradhan, and R K Gupta
Infectious meningitis: prospective evaluation with magnetization transfer MRI
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2004; 77(917): 387 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.