AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rummeny, E
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rummeny, E
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 1, 63-72
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Primary liver tumors: diagnosis by MR imaging

E Rummeny, R Weissleder, DD Stark, S Saini, CC Compton, W Bennett, PF Hahn, J Wittenberg, RA Malt, and JT Ferrucci

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

MR features of 153 proved primary liver tumors (95 malignant, 58 benign) in 55 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (21), cholangiocarcinoma (seven), carcinosarcoma (one), hepatoblastoma (one), hemangioma (16), hepatic adenoma (four), focal nodular hyperplasia (three), leiomyoma (one), and hemangioendothelioma (one) were studied retrospectively to determine which techniques are most reliable for lesion detection and which criteria are most useful for differential diagnosis. MR data were correlated with histologic features such as fatty degeneration, fibrosis, and peritumoral edema. Unlike metastatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma was best detected (p less than .01) with T2-weighted pulse sequences. The mean tumor-liver T2 difference was 34.4%, while the mean T1 difference was only 21.8%. A tissue-specific diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was possible in 14 of 21 patients by identification of fatty degeneration of the tumor (eight of 17), tumor capsule (five of 21), and/or vascular invasion (six of 21). MR features of peritumoral edema, present in six of 21 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and in seven of 25 patients with metastases, were exclusively associated with malignant tumors. The large variation in tissue characteristics (relaxation times and proton density) seen in primary liver tumors necessitates the use of multiple pulse sequences to maximize lesion detection. However, the combined use of T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted phase-contrast images had the advantage of distinguishing benign from malignant primary liver tumors in 48 of 55 patients in this series.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. N. Burns and S. R. Wilson
Focal Liver Masses: Enhancement Patterns on Contrast-enhanced Images--Concordance of US Scans with CT Scans and MR Images
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 162 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. G. Deane, H. Lee, J. Hamaamen, A. Ruley, M. K. Washington, B. LaFleur, S. S. Thorgeirsson, R. Price, and R. D. Beauchamp
Enhanced Tumor Formation in Cyclin D1 x Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Double Transgenic Mice with Characterization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Szklaruk, P. M. Silverman, and C. Charnsangavej
Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, Treatment, and Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 441 - 454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Pirovano, A. Vanzulli, L. Marti-Bonmati, L. Grazioli, R. Manfredi, A. Greco, N. Holzknecht, H. E. Daldrup-Link, E. Rummeny, B. Hamm, et al.
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MR Imaging in the Detection and Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1111 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal, P. Thomas, I. Nasser, O. Cay, and R. A. Kane
Hepatic Colon Cancer Metastases in Mice: Dynamic in Vivo Correlation with Hypoechoic Rims Visible at US
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 852 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Ebara, H. Fukuda, Y. Kojima, N. Morimoto, M. Yoshikawa, N. Sugiura, T. Satoh, F. Kondo, M. Yukawa, T. Matsumoto, et al.
Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Relationship of Signal Intensity to Histopathologic Findings and Metal Content of the Tumor and Surrounding Hepatic Parenchyma
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 81 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J.M. Jessup and F.M. Graeme-Cook
Case 2-1996- A 32-Year-Old Woman with Subcostal Pain and a Left Hepatic Mass
N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 1996; 334(3): 176 - 183.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.