AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amendola, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amendola, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 1, 97-102
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Fluoroscopically guided pyeloureteral interventions by using a perurethral transvesical approach

MA Amendola, MP Banner, HM Pollack, and RL Gordon

Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

Using a perurethral transvesical approach, we attempted a total of 180 varied pyeloureteral uroradiologic interventional procedures during a 20-month period; 168 were successfully accomplished (93% success rate). We used standard interventional equipment, fluoroscopy, and (for access to the upper urinary tract) ureteral catheters that had been partially or completely inserted at cystoscopy by urologists. The successful procedures included insertion of double-pigtail ureteral stents (42 procedures), insertion of single-pigtail ureteral stents (47), advancement of arrested or incompletely inserted retrograde ureteral catheters (42), urothelial biopsy (30), balloon dilatation of ureteral strictures (three), retrograde cannulation of ureteropelvic junction obstructions that could not be negotiated in a percutaneous antegrade fashion (three), and ureteral stone extraction (one). The method was unsuccessful in 12 patients. Failures were due to caudal migration of a ureteral catheter into the bladder in eight patients and to an inability to advance a guidewire beyond an area of ureteral obstruction or perforation in four. Although most commonly used as an adjunct to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral calculi, the perurethral approach was extremely valuable for a wide variety of other indications. Significant complications, encountered in 5% of the procedures, included urosepsis (two), ureteral perforations (five), and cannulation of a false ureteral lumen (two). These problems resolved without sequelae with conservative management. The perurethral transvesical approach represents a relatively simple, safe, and expeditious interventional uroradiologic method. It frequently obviated other more invasive interventions such as percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteroscopy, or surgery.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.