AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheline, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arenson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheline, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arenson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 2, 261-263
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs

ME Sheline, I Brikman, DM Epstein, JL Mezrich, HL Kundel, and RL Arenson

Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

We compared plain chest radiographs, standard (bones white) digitized images, and inverse-intensity (bones black) images to determine their ability to identify pathologically confirmed malignant pulmonary nodules. The images were digitized by using a photo-optical laser scanner and were displayed on a 1024 x 1024 x 8 bit system capable of operator-controlled magnification (2x or 4x) and nonlinear (logarithmic/exponential) contrast transformation in both standard and inverse-intensity modes. Receiver-operator curve analysis was used to study the detection performance of six observers who viewed 40 images obtained in 15 normal subjects and 25 abnormal subjects. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the ROC curve between the standard digital images and the plain chest radiographs. However, ROC areas were significantly greater (p less than or equal to .05) for inverse-intensity digital images when compared with either standard-intensity digital images or plain chest radiographs. These results suggest that inverse-intensity images may have some advantages in the detection of pulmonary nodules.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. K. Shah, J. H. M. Austin, C. S. White, P. Patel, L. B. Haramati, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and Y. M. Berkmen
Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.