AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Demetris, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Demetris, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 2, 285-287
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Periportal low-attenuation areas on CT: value as evidence of liver transplant rejection

SB Kaplan, JH Sumkin, WL Campbell, AB Zajko, and AJ Demetris

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Presbyterian-University Hospital, PA 15213.

CT scans of liver transplants may show periportal areas that are lower in attenuation than adjacent portal veins and liver. These areas appear as low-density rims that surround or parallel the portal vein and its intrahepatic branches as well as the immediate subhepatic portal area. In order to determine the value of periportal low attenuation as an indicator of rejection, we reviewed the CT scans of 37 liver transplant patients with biopsy evidence of either acute rejection (12 patients) or nonspecific change without rejection (25 patients). Low-attenuation areas around peripheral portal branches were identified in six of 12 patients with rejection and in four of 25 patients with nonspecific change (sensitivity, 50%; specificity, 84%; accuracy, 73%). The correlation between peripheral periportal low attenuation and rejection was statistically significant (p less than .05). Periportal low attenuation in a central location was seen in eight of 12 patients with acute rejection and in 14 of 25 patients with nonspecific change (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 44%; accuracy, 51%). The correlation was not statistically significant. Low-attenuation areas were evident on scans obtained either with or without IV contrast enhancement. Periportal low-attenuation areas are commonly seen on CT scans of liver transplants. Peripheral areas correlate with acute rejection, but other factors probably contribute to their occurrence. Central areas do not correlate with acute rejection. Low sensitivity and relatively low accuracy limit the usefulness of peripheral periportal low attenuation as a sign of acute liver allograft rejection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
A S Shaw, S M Ryan, R C Beese, S Norris, M Bowles, M Rela, and P S Sidhu
Liver transplantation
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 314 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.