AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 3, 483-486
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system

VP Jackson, CD Harrill, SJ White, KR Gillespie, JT Mail, and BP Katz

Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46202.

We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a five-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), four blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A D Dimakopoulou, I A Tsalafoutas, E K Georgiou, and E N Yakoumakis
Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.