AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 3, 547-549
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Immature bone infarcts: findings on plain radiographs and MR scans

PL Munk, CA Helms, and RG Holt

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

We studied the plain film findings in eight patients with immature bone-marrow infarction and correlated the findings with those of MR imaging in four of the cases. Seven patients had underlying systemic disease, including sickle cell disease (two), systemic lupus erythematosus (two), acute lymphocytic leukemia (one), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (one), and renal transplantation (one). In one patient, the bone infarct was idiopathic. Plain films in three of the eight cases were misinterpreted as showing aggressive lesions (i.e., malignancy or infection), and these patients underwent a biopsy that proved the diagnosis of bone infarction. In the other five cases, the diagnoses were established by clinical follow-up. The plain film findings in all eight cases consisted of subtle, mottled, ill-defined radiolucencies in the diametaphyseal region. Four of the patients had mild sclerosis. MR imaging in all four cases in which it was performed showed a central area with high or intermediate signal with a serpentine, thin, low-signal border. The lesions shown by MR imaging corresponded to the areas of abnormality on the plain films and had an appearance similar to that of previously reported bone infarcts. Our experience suggests that in patients with nonspecific subtle radiographic bone changes and an underlying systemic disease, MR imaging is helpful in establishing the diagnosis of bone marrow infarction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. S. Stacy and L. B. Dixon
Pitfalls in MR Image Interpretation Prompting Referrals to an Orthopedic Oncology Clinic
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 805 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y.-l. Chan, C.-k. Li, W. C.-w. Chu, L.-m. Pang, J. C.-y. Cheng, and K.-W. Chik
Deferoxamine-Induced Bone Dysplasia in the Distal Femur and Patella of Pediatric Patients and Young Adults: MR Imaging Appearance
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1561 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.