AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Share, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Share, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 3, 567-571
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Ectopic ureterocele without ureteral and calyceal dilatation (ureterocele disproportion): findings on urography and sonography

JC Share and RL Lebowitz

Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Eight infants and children (six girls) were seen over a 13-year period with duplex collecting systems and ectopic ureteroceles. In each, there was striking dissimilarity in size between the large ureterocele and its diminutive ureter and calyces. The upper moiety did not function and, except for the ureterocele, the indirect urographic and direct sonographic signs of duplication were absent or subtle. We call this entity ureterocele disproportion. Seven patients presented with urinary infection and one was found to have hydronephrosis of a dilated lower moiety in utero. Five had ipsilateral lower-pole reflux, which ranged in degree from 3 to 5 (on a scale of 1-5). Two had bilateral duplication; one of these had a typical contralateral ectopic ureterocele. The diagnosis of ureterocele disproportion was strongly suggested by urography and sonography and was confirmed at cystoscopy by direct puncture of the ureterocele and opacification of the upper moiety. All had surgery. The approach varied and depended on the status of the lower moiety and the contralateral kidney. One had incision of the ureterocele only. Five with lower-pole reflux had excision of the ureterocele and ipsilateral common-sheath reimplantation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.