AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parvey, H.
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parvey, H.
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 4, 765-770
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Duplex sonography of the portal venous system: pitfalls and limitations

HR Parvey, RL Eisenberg, V Giyanani, and CA Krebs

Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport 71130.

Duplex pulsed-Doppler sonographic examinations of the portal venous systems of 14 patients were reviewed, and the results were compared with the findings of other examinations including endoscopy and angiography. The sonograms of virtually every patient in the sample showed at least one of four pitfalls. The "mirror-image" artifact, in which the Doppler signal contained simultaneous and symmetric elements on both sides of the zero baseline, was identified in 11 patients (79%). The "flip" artifact, in which the Doppler signal would either flip from one side of the zero baseline to the other or would indicate a direction of blood flow opposite to that normally expected, was seen in six patients (43%). In four patients (29%), a Doppler flow signal could not be obtained from small vessels that were identified on standard real-time images. In 10 patients (71%), important vascular channels including bleeding gastroesophageal varices were obscured by bowel gas, ascites, or the patient's body habitus. Duplex sonography may still provide useful information about portal venous hemodynamics. However, it remains a prodigious technical undertaking whose accuracy can be severely hampered by artifacts and inherent technical difficulties.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. M. Brandenburg, R. D. Frank, U. Janssen, P. Wurth, J. Floege, and J. Riehl
Ultrasonographic fata morgana
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 845 - 846.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.