AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karasick, S
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karasick, S
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 4, 777-779
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography

S Karasick and AF Goldfarb

Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

We studied the efficacy of hysterosalpingography in the detection of peritubal adhesions without tubal occlusion by using laparoscopy as the gold standard for the diagnosis. Peritubal adhesions were diagnosed on hysterosalpingography by using the following radiographic criteria alone or in combination: (1) convoluted fallopian tube, (2) loculation of spillage of contrast medium into the peritoneal cavity, (3) ampullary dilatation, (4) peritubal halo effect (double-contour appearance of the tubal wall), and (5) vertical fallopian tube. The first 100 patients with the diagnosis of adhesions on hysterosalpingography who also had laparoscopy were included in the study. Seventy-five patients had the diagnosis confirmed on laparoscopy, resulting in a 25% false-positive diagnosis of adhesions with hysterosalpingography. Thirty-nine (52%) of these 75 patients had one radiographic finding alone, and 20 of these patients had loculation of spillage of contrast medium. Although the patients with adhesions tended to have two or more of the radiographic findings, the difference was not statistically significant. The most frequent radiographic findings found in combination were convoluted fallopian tube and loculation of spillage of contrast medium. These findings suggest that hysterosalpingography can be the diagnostic procedure of choice in the initial investigation of infertility due to peritubal adhesions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Valentini, L. Muzii, R. Marana, G. F. Catalano, V. Summaria, F. Felici, A. Rossetti, and C. Destito
Improvement of Hysterosalpingographic Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Peritubal Adhesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1173 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.