|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.
Diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients may be difficult because of the coexistence of chronic cellulitis, vascular insufficiency, and peripheral neuropathy. This study compared the diagnostic accuracies of plain films, bone scans, and MR imaging studies in diabetic patients with suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot. Twenty-nine plain radiographs, 20 bone scans, and 30 MR studies were obtained in 24 patients. Twenty-nine bones from 14 patients were pathologically proved either positive (25 bones) or negative (four bones) for osteomyelitis. Another 15 bones (10 patients) studied with MR had no pathologic proof, but the bones healed with only local wound care and/or a short course of oral antibiotics. These patients had trauma, cellulitis, or unhealed ulcers. The sensitivity and specificity of plain films were both 75%. Bone scans had a very low specificity (100% false-positive rate). A negative bone scan should strongly exclude the probability of osteomyelitis. Unlike the findings in previous reports, MR had much higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scans in detecting osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. When the 10 patients without pathologic proof (those who presumably had neuroarthropathy, vascular insufficiency, and/or cellulitis) were included, the sensitivity and specificity of all three techniques decreased. Our experience with this small group of patients suggests that MR is a useful imaging technique for diagnosing osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Butalia, V. A. Palda, R. J. Sargeant, A. S. Detsky, and O. Mourad Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity? JAMA, February 20, 2008; 299(7): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Lavery, D. G. Armstrong, E. J.G. Peters, and B. A. Lipsky Probe-to-Bone Test for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Reliable or relic? Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 270 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kapoor, S. Page, M. LaValley, D. R. Gale, and D. T. Felson Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Foot Osteomyelitis: A Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Ahmadi, W. B. Morrison, J. A. Carrino, M. E. Schweitzer, S. M. Raikin, and H. P. Ledermann Neuropathic Arthropathy of the Foot with and without Superimposed Osteomyelitis: MR Imaging Characteristics Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 622 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Giurini and T. E. Lyons Diabetic Foot Complications: Diagnosis and Management International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 171 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Collins, M. M. Schaar, D. E. Wenger, and J. N. Mandrekar T1-Weighted MRI Characteristics of Pedal Osteomyelitis Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 386 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Jacobson and J. E. Williams Bone Scintigraphic Findings in Patients with Foot Ulcers and Normal Plain Film Radiographs J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2003; 93(2): 91 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Ledermann, W. B. Morrison, and M. E. Schweitzer Pedal Abscesses in Patients Suspected of Having Pedal Osteomyelitis: Analysis with MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 649 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Rosenberg, J. Beltran, and J. T. Bencardino MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 153S - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |