AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuh, W.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuh, W.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 4, 795-800
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients: evaluation with plain film, 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, and MR imaging

WT Yuh, JD Corson, HM Baraniewski, K Rezai, AR Shamma, MH Kathol, Y Sato, GY el-Khoury, DR Hawes, CE Platz, and al. et

Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients may be difficult because of the coexistence of chronic cellulitis, vascular insufficiency, and peripheral neuropathy. This study compared the diagnostic accuracies of plain films, bone scans, and MR imaging studies in diabetic patients with suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot. Twenty-nine plain radiographs, 20 bone scans, and 30 MR studies were obtained in 24 patients. Twenty-nine bones from 14 patients were pathologically proved either positive (25 bones) or negative (four bones) for osteomyelitis. Another 15 bones (10 patients) studied with MR had no pathologic proof, but the bones healed with only local wound care and/or a short course of oral antibiotics. These patients had trauma, cellulitis, or unhealed ulcers. The sensitivity and specificity of plain films were both 75%. Bone scans had a very low specificity (100% false-positive rate). A negative bone scan should strongly exclude the probability of osteomyelitis. Unlike the findings in previous reports, MR had much higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scans in detecting osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. When the 10 patients without pathologic proof (those who presumably had neuroarthropathy, vascular insufficiency, and/or cellulitis) were included, the sensitivity and specificity of all three techniques decreased. Our experience with this small group of patients suggests that MR is a useful imaging technique for diagnosing osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Butalia, V. A. Palda, R. J. Sargeant, A. S. Detsky, and O. Mourad
Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity?
JAMA, February 20, 2008; 299(7): 806 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
L. A. Lavery, D. G. Armstrong, E. J.G. Peters, and B. A. Lipsky
Probe-to-Bone Test for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Reliable or relic?
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 270 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Kapoor, S. Page, M. LaValley, D. R. Gale, and D. T. Felson
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Foot Osteomyelitis: A Meta-analysis
Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Ahmadi, W. B. Morrison, J. A. Carrino, M. E. Schweitzer, S. M. Raikin, and H. P. Ledermann
Neuropathic Arthropathy of the Foot with and without Superimposed Osteomyelitis: MR Imaging Characteristics
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 622 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDSHome page
J. M. Giurini and T. E. Lyons
Diabetic Foot Complications: Diagnosis and Management
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 171 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Collins, M. M. Schaar, D. E. Wenger, and J. N. Mandrekar
T1-Weighted MRI Characteristics of Pedal Osteomyelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 386 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
A. F. Jacobson and J. E. Williams
Bone Scintigraphic Findings in Patients with Foot Ulcers and Normal Plain Film Radiographs
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2003; 93(2): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. P. Ledermann, W. B. Morrison, and M. E. Schweitzer
Pedal Abscesses in Patients Suspected of Having Pedal Osteomyelitis: Analysis with MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 649 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Z. S. Rosenberg, J. Beltran, and J. T. Bencardino
MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 153S - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.