AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raghavan, N
Right arrow Articles by Norman, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raghavan, N
Right arrow Articles by Norman, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 4, 843-852
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging in the tethered spinal cord syndrome

N Raghavan, AJ Barkovich, M Edwards, and D Norman

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

MR examinations of the spine were reviewed in 25 patients with a clinical diagnosis of tethered spinal cord. In 21 patients (84%), the level of the tip of the conus was below the mid L2 vertebral body. The causes of the tethering were spinal lipomas (72%), tight filum terminale syndrome (12%), diastematomyelia (8%), and myelomeningocele (8%). These entities were readily identified in all instances. Bony dysraphisms were well demonstrated by MR. Interestingly, cavitary lesions/myelomalacia of the conus or the cord adjacent to the tethering lesion were seen with appropriate images in nine of 20 patients. This unexpected finding may have diagnostic and/or prognostic significance. Spinal MR was found to be extremely useful in the evaluation of the suspected tethered spinal cord. It was able to visualize the conus medullaris, assess the thickness of the filum terminale, identify traction lesions, and evaluate associated bony dysraphisms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. D. Witkamp, W. P. Vandertop, F. J. A. Beek, N. C. Notermans, R. H. J. M. Gooskens, and P. F. G. M. van Waes
Medullary Cone Movement in Subjects with a Normal Spinal Cord and in Patients with a Tethered Spinal Cord
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 208 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. S. Medina, M. Al-Orfali, D. Zurakowski, T. Y. Poussaint, J. DiCanzio, and P. D. Barnes
Occult Lumbosacral Dysraphism in Children and Young Adults: Diagnostic Performance of Fast Screening and Conventional MR Imaging
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 767 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.