AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallam, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperberg, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hallam, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperberg, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 5, 1101-1105
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Color-flow Doppler and conventional duplex scanning of the carotid bifurcation: prospective, double-blind, correlative study

MJ Hallam, JM Reid, and PL Cooperberg

Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Color-flow Doppler is a useful adjunct in duplex sonography of peripheral vessels. This study was undertaken to see if color-flow Doppler could give semiquantitative information about the degree of stenosis at the origin of the internal carotid artery. The factors evaluated on color flow are the width of the lumen as estimated from the color-flow image relative to the width of the vessel, the degree of turbulence (evidenced by the mosaic pattern), and the pulse-repetition frequency necessary to prevent aliasing. A double-blind comparison with conventional duplex scanning in 146 carotid bifurcations in 74 patients was carried out. In 91%, the color-flow assessment was in complete agreement with the duplex assessment. In the remaining 9%, the color flow differed from the duplex by only one stenosis group, and the distributions of over- and under-estimation were equal. These results showed comparable assessment of the degree of stenosis with conventional duplex and color Doppler technology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Gaitini and M. Soudack
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis by Doppler Sonography: State of the Art
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2005; 24(8): 1127 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Eliasziw, R.N. Rankin, A.J. Fox, R.B. Haynes, and H.J.M. Barnett
Accuracy and Prognostic Consequences of Ultrasonography in Identifying Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis
Stroke, October 1, 1995; 26(10): 1747 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
S. Rizzo, G. Cardia, M. Fullone, and G. Regina
Noninvasive Preoperative Evaluation of Carotid Atheroma: Echo-Color-Doppler Versus Duplex Scanning
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, June 1, 1993; 27(5): 357 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.