AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Post, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Post, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 6, 1271-1276
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of intracranial carotid occlusion

BH Katz, RM Quencer, JO Kaplan, RS Hinks, and MJ Post

Department of Radiology, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Medical Center, FL.

The MR scans of seven patients with intracranial carotid occlusion (five proved, two presumed) were reviewed to evaluate the MR signal characteristics seen in this disorder. Five patients had clinical signs of cerebral infarction. Of the remaining two patients, one was asymptomatic and the other had a long-standing occlusion and headaches. We correlated the MR findings with cerebral angiography in five patients and with CT scans in six patients. All occluded vessels demonstrated MR signal predominantly isointense to brain on proton-density- T1- and T2-weighted images. Since there is an absence of flow, the MR signal is based on the intrinsic properties of the arterial thrombus and possibly on the chronicity of the occlusion. The pathogenesis and histopathology of intravascular thrombus differ significantly from extravascular hematoma, which accounts for the differences in their MR signal characteristics. The demonstration of occluded intracranial vessels may solidify the diagnosis of stroke in cases in which clinical and/or CT findings are equivocal. In patients presenting with infarction, an occluded carotid artery by MR may obviate the need for angiography; however, the demonstration of a patent carotid in conjunction with infarction suggests the possibility of an embolus, which may require angiography. We believe that MR is a valuable adjunct to CT in evaluating patients with cerebrovascular infarction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.