AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, N.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, N.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 1, 173-178
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Detection of thrombus by using phase-image MR scans: ROC curve analysis

NJ Tavares, W Auffermann, JJ Brown, TJ Gilbert, C Sommerhoff, and CB Higgins

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco Medical School 94143.

Spin-echo phase images have been shown to be sensitive to blood flow and have been used to differentiate slow flow from thrombus, with an apparent advantage in comparison with spin-echo intensity images alone. In order to quantify the diagnostic efficacy of phase images, a study was performed comparing the sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging in identifying intravascular thrombus using spin-echo magnitude images alone and combined with phase images. In 45 subjects, 66 vessels with questionable intraluminal signal were reviewed in a blinded manner by four radiologists using seven levels of certitude for the diagnosis of thrombus. Vessels in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis were included in the evaluation and were selected on the basis of the presence of intraluminal signal, which raised the possibility of intravascular disease. Corroborative studies were available in all cases. Receiver-operator-characteristic curves were constructed for the accuracy of the decision of intraluminal thrombus vs flow signal when using magnitude images alone and when using magnitude plus phase images. Magnitude images identified thrombus with a sensitivity of 35% at a specificity of 90%. On the other hand, combining magnitude image and phase images yielded sensitivities of 85% and 83% at specificities of 90% and 95%, respectively. We conclude that addition of phase images substantially increases the level of confidence in detecting intravascular thrombosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.