AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 1, 179-183
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The economic impact of technology on diagnostic imaging at a university medical center

RG Evens

Department of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Diagnostic imaging procedures and charges were analyzed for the most recent 15 years (1973-1988) and projected for 5 years in the future (1993) by using recent trends in a large, university-based radiology institute. During the 20 years, procedure volume doubles, total charges increase by a factor of 10 without adjusting for inflation and by a factor of three after adjusting for inflation. The major reason for the increase in charges is a change in the mix of procedures with increasing emphasis on new technology (CT, MR, sonography, and nuclear radiology) and interventional procedures. New technology and interventional procedures will change from 5% of total procedures in 1973 to a projected 27% in 1993. These more complex and more costly procedures have resulted in a considerably higher share of the charges for radiology and are projected to be responsible for 73% of a $109 million total charge by 1993. The charges for traditional radiology procedures have risen at approximately the inflation rate. These data document that the considerable benefit derived from new technology is associated with considerable cost and that new technology procedures are a major economic factor in modern diagnostic imaging.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.