AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Czarnecki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Splittgerber, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Czarnecki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Splittgerber, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 2, 261-263
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Toluidine blue dye as a breast localization marker

DJ Czarnecki, HK Feider, and GF Splittgerber

Department of Radiology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53215.

We compared the efficacy of toluidine blue dye vs methylene blue as a visual marker for breast localizations in vitro and in vivo. In phase 1, the dyes were injected into 10 mastectomy specimens and allowed to diffuse for 24-48 hr. In phase 2, the breasts of four premastectomy patients were injected with the dyes and the dyes were allowed to diffuse for 3 3/4, 12, 24, and 47 hr before mastectomy. In phase 3, the breasts of 18 women in whom 20 breast localizations were performed before excisional biopsy were injected with methylene blue or toluidine blue up to 2 hr 10 min before the biopsy. All excised stained breast tissue was evaluated blindly. The amount of pain associated with injections of the dye was recorded. The 22 women in phases 2 and 3 had had mammograms before, and the parenchymal patterns had been classified according to Wolfe. In the patients injected 3 3/4, 12, 24, and 47 hr before mastectomy, more intense staining with less diffusibility was seen with toluidine blue than with methylene blue. In the 20 localization procedures before excisional biopsy, no difference in intensity of staining or radius of diffusion was seen between methylene blue and toluidine blue with maximal diffusion times of 2 hr 10 min. Breast parenchymal pattern did not correlate with stain intensity or diffusibility. The six patients in whom both methylene blue and toluidine blue were injected and the 18 patients in whom either dye was injected felt less discomfort at the time of injection of toluidine blue than of methylene blue. Our results suggest that toluidine blue causes less discomfort and produces a more intense stain with a smaller diffusion radius than methylene blue regardless of breast parenchymal pattern.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. P. Tegos and M. R. Hamblin
Phenothiazinium Antimicrobial Photosensitizers Are Substrates of Bacterial Multidrug Resistance Pumps
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 196 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. N. Demidova and M. R. Hamblin
Effect of Cell-Photosensitizer Binding and Cell Density on Microbial Photoinactivation
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2005; 49(6): 2329 - 2335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.