AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheline, M
Right arrow Articles by Wein, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheline, M
Right arrow Articles by Wein, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 2, 313-316
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Fluoroscopically guided retrograde brush biopsy in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: results in 45 patients

M Sheline, MA Amendola, HM Pollack, MP Banner, A de las Morenas, and AJ Wein

Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

This is a retrospective review of 45 patients suspected of having transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract who underwent fluoroscopically guided retrograde brush biopsy at our institution during a recent 3-year period. All patients evaluated had an abnormal IV urogram or retrograde pyelogram in which the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney or ureter was suspected or could not be excluded. The results of the brush biopsy were compared with the final diagnosis established at surgery or through clinical and surgical follow-up. Results of the biopsies were classified into five categories: (I) normal transitional epithelium (16 patients), (II) atypical cells (eight patients), (III) dysplastic cells (two patients), (IV) suspicious for malignancy (four patients), and (V) conclusive evidence of malignancy (eight patients). In four additional patients, other miscellaneous diagnoses were made, and in three others the procedure was nondiagnostic. Brush biopsies interpreted as Categories III, IV, and V had a positive predictive value of 100% (14/14) for the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma, and biopsies showing atypical cells (Category II) had a positive predictive value of 75% (6/8). Tabulating all diagnostic categories except for normal as a positive diagnosis, the procedure had a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 88%, and an accuracy of 89%. No significant complications were encountered. This experience suggests that brush biopsy is a valuable technique in patients suspected of having transitional cell carcinoma.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.