AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fakhry, J
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fakhry, J
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 2, 321-323
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The hypoechoic band: a normal finding on testicular sonography

J Fakhry, A Khoury, and K Barakat

Department of Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.

High-resolution sonograms were obtained in 119 patients in whom intrascrotal disease was suspected on the basis of history and physical findings. In 20 of these patients, a total of 22 conspicuous hypoechoic intratesticular bands (18 unilateral and four bilateral) were seen in the middle third of the testicle on scans obtained axially or slightly oblique to conventional axial scans. The bands were up to 3 mm wide and 3 cm long. The bands were on the side with suspected disease in six patients. Of these, three patients had a small epididymal cyst, one had a mild hydrocele, and two had no other sonographic finding. The remaining 16 bands were on the side opposite that with clinically suspected disease and were seen in otherwise normal testes. Follow-up examination in 11 of the 20 patients with the band showed no change. In four of eight patients examined with pulsed Doppler sonography, a normal low-resistance waveform was seen that was characteristic of intratesticular arteries (with gradual descent after peak systole and relatively high diastolic flow). In three of these patients, color Doppler imaging corroborated the presence of arterial flow, which did not fill the entire width of the band, thus suggesting an additional venous component of lower velocity in the band. Identification of flow in only half the cases may have been caused by the limitations in sensitivity of the equipment. We conclude that the hypoechoic bands noted on gray-scale testicular sonography are caused by a normal variant of intratesticular vessels, artery and vein, and that they are of no clinical significance.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.